欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 27-39.

• 文学新探 • 上一篇    下一篇

《文心雕龙》文学通变论的意义建构与整体解读

姚爱斌   

  1. 北京师范大学 文学院、文艺学研究中心,北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-19 出版日期:2019-05-25 发布日期:2019-11-01
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国古代文体论概念史研究(先秦至隋唐)”(15JJD750004),国家社科基金一般项目“中国文体论的原初生成与现代嬗变”( 13BZW016)。

The Meaning Construction and Whole Interpretation on Literary Theory of “Continuity and Change” in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons

YAO Aibin   

  1. School of Chinese Language and Literature, BNU, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2017-05-19 Online:2019-05-25 Published:2019-11-01

摘要: 《文心雕龙》“通变”论并非《周易》“通变”论在文论中的直接运用。在《周易》“通变”论中,“变”是天然合理的,“变”是“通”的条件,“通”是“变”的结果。但在刘勰看来,南朝以来的文学“新变”产生了太多的“爱奇”之风、“浮诡”之言和“淫丽”之辞,导致了“文体解散”的严重弊端,使文章之“变”成为需要反思和批判的现象。由此造成了刘勰文学“通变”论的独特思路和特殊内涵:其论述重点不是提倡和推动文章之“变”,而是强调通过对源于经典的“有常之体”的“相因”来规范文章之“变”,以克服“新变”之弊;其所说的“通”也主要不是指向文章之“变”的结果,而是指向文章之“变”的前提,即对传统“有常之体”的“会通”。刘勰将传统“通变”论置入《文心雕龙》“以正驭奇、以常驭变”的整体论文思路,创造性地重建了“通变”概念的意义结构和具体内涵,从而将《周易》“变而通之”意义上的一般“通变”论,转换成了《文心雕龙·通变》篇“会通—适变”意义上的文学“通变”论。

关键词: 文心雕龙, 通变, 有常之体, 循环相因, 意义转换

Abstract: The literary theory of “continuity and change” (tong bian) in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons (Wen Xin Diao Long) by LIU Xie is more than straight applying the concept of “continuity and change” from The Book of Changes (Zhou Yi). According to the Book of Changes, “change” is naturally reasonable and provides the condition for “continuity”, and the latter is the result of the former. In LIU Xie's view, however, “new change” in literary was featured with the exotic, shocking and frivolous expressions since the Southern Dynasties, which led to the serious problem of “inconsistence between content and expression”, so this kind of “change” in literary was worthy of reflection and criticism. The unique thinking and connotation of LIU Xie's “continuity and change” lies in constraining the disadvantages of “new change” in expression by inheriting conventional form of classics rather than promoting this so-called “change”, and in considering “continuity” as the premise of the “change” and intuiting the “continuity” of conventional form, rather than the result of “change”. In The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons, LIU Xie applied the traditional theory of “continuity and change” into an overall literary structure, and suggested constraining the novelty and change by norm and continuity. He creatively reconstructed the meaning structure and connotation of “continuity and change” and interpreted it as “intuiting and adapting”, deriving from the meaning of “change for continuity” (bian er tong zhi) in The Book of Changes.

Key words: The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons (Wen Xin Diao Long), “continuity and change” (tong bian) , conventional form, recurrent trend, meaning conversion

中图分类号: