欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 39-52.

• 教育论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

高校“人才争夺”:谁是受益者?——基于“长江学者”获得者的实证分析

黄海刚, 连洁, 曲越   

  1. 对外经济贸易大学 中国开放经济与国际科技合作战略研究中心,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-22 出版日期:2018-09-25 发布日期:2019-06-21
  • 基金资助:
    北京教育科学“十三五”规划2017年度重点课题“北京‘高端引领人才’聚集的策略与路径研究”——基于推拉理论的视角(BAAA17036)。

War for Talent among Universities:Brain Drain or Brain Gain? ——An Empirical Analysis of the Mobility of Yangtze River Scholar of China

HUANG Hai-gang, LIAN Jie, QU Yue   

  1. Strategy Center for China‘s Open Economy and International Technology Cooperation, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2017-06-22 Online:2018-09-25 Published:2019-06-21

摘要: 在“双一流”建设背景下,拥有丰富学术资本与社会网络的高端人才成为高校“人才争夺”的主要对象,这种情况引发了关于高端人才过度与无序流动的争论。根据1999-2014年“长江学者”特聘教授获得者数据,分析高端人才在区域和组织间的流动路径和结构性失衡问题,发现:在地域特征上,华东和华南地区是高端人才流动的首选目的地;“中西部危机”和“东北部困境”不仅表现在人才输出规模上,更表现在极度匮乏的人才输入和回流上;在机构特征上,东南部的部分高校短期内获得了学科发展的高端人才,位于中部和东北部的部分大学人才损失较为明显;从组织视角看,通过高端人才引进来提升高校声望是一条便捷且可复制的路径,这一共识加剧了人才竞争,从知识生产与传播的视角看,人才流动所带来的“增量效应”并未充分显现。研究认为,我国高端人才不存在过度流动问题,但流动方向的线性模式而非环流模式是造成人才无序流动的主要原因。研究认为,致力于促进人才有序流动的公共政策努力,既要理性看待人才竞争问题,也要解决人才标签化的行政逻辑与资源优化配置的市场逻辑间的悖论问题。

关键词: 人才竞争, 人才流动, 长江学者, 职业流动, “双一流”建设

Abstract: In the context of “Double First-rate” Strategy, war for talent among universities catches the attention of both researchers and policy makers. This study took 1840 Yangtze River Scholars of China between the years 1999 and 2014 as the database to analyze the path of their career flow. This study suggests that the main problem of research scientists' mobility in China is not the problem of scale and frequency, but it is problem of the flow direction. Second, the phenomenon of “peacock flying to southeast” does exist, and the eastern and southern areas are the important locations of scientist mobility. Third, the main problems of the so-called “Midwest Crisis” and “Northeast Dilemma” not only refer to the scale of brain drain, but also indicate a lower talent attractiveness in these areas. Finally, the university administration believes that the short cut to promote a university's competitiveness is to obtain more scientists and scholars who are competitive. For a rational and orderly mobility of scientists and scholars, it is necessary to resolve the paradox between the administration and the talent market.

Key words: war for talent, scientist mobility, Yangtze River Scholar of China, job-to-job mobility, “Double First-rate” Strategy

中图分类号: