欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是 2025年4月11日 星期五

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 138-145.

• 哲学反思 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种“海德格尔式的马克思主义”研究

张涛,陶富源   

  1. 安徽师范大学 马克思主义学院,芜湖 241002
  • 出版日期:2019-03-25 发布日期:2019-03-25
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金青年项目“以海德格尔存在论解读马克思主义理论倾向研究”(15CKS028)

On the Two Modes of “Heideggerian Marxism”

ZHANG Tao,TAO Fuyuan   

  1. School of Marxism,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241002,China
  • Online:2019-03-25 Published:2019-03-25

摘要: 马尔库塞和科西克的“海德格尔式的马克思主义”是会通海德格尔与马克思的两种典型理论形态。虽然其各自的理论表述不同,却都是通过对教条的马克思主义和海德格尔空洞存在的双向反思,在海德格尔生存论的地基上融合马克思的对象性活动、异化劳动等理论,追寻一种能够超越二元分立的具体哲学,建构感性存在论,这具有深刻的启发意义。然而,由于两种“海德格尔式的马克思主义”仍以海德格尔生存论为主导原则,因此无法克服以意识内在性为基本建制的现代形而上学。应在对两种“海德格尔式的马克思主义”的批判反思中,转向马克思感性、对象性原理的原则高度,以开启出切中社会现实的、更广阔的历史唯物主义现象学空间。

关键词: “海德格尔式的马克思主义”, 具体哲学, 感性存在论, 会通

Abstract: “Heideggerian Marxism” represented respectively by Herbert Marcuse and Karel Kosik are two typical theoretical modes integrating Heideggerian thoughts and Marxism.Though different in their theoretical expounding,both are based on the bidirectional reflection on Marxist dogmatism and Heidegger's concept of empty “existentialism”,and attempt to integrate Heidegger's theories with Marx's ideas on objective activities and alienated labor.They are profoundly provoking for constructing a concrete philosophy by transcending binary separation and an ontology of sensuousness.However,the two modes of “Heideggerian Marxism” take the Heidegger's existentialism as the dominant principle,so they fail to overcome the shortcomings of modern metaphysics framed in interiority of consciousness.From the critical reflection “Heideggerian Marxism”,we should shift to explore the principle level of Marx's theories on sensuousness and objectiveness in order to open a broader and more realistic historical materialist phenomenology.

Key words: Heideggerian Marxism, concrete philosophy, ontology of sensuousness, integration

中图分类号: