欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 33-41.

• 汉语汉字研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

经典义理阐释的训诂机制——以朱熹《中庸章句》为例

王立军   

  1. 北京师范大学 文学院、民俗典籍文字研究中心,北京 100875
  • 出版日期:2025-03-25 发布日期:2025-04-11
  • 作者简介:王立军,文学博士,北京师范大学文学院教授。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于历代训释资源库的中国特色阐释学理论建构与实践研究”(22&ZDB257);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大专项“中国传统语言学的理论精华及其现代化”(2024JZDZ041)。

The Exegetical Mechanism of Classical Argumentation Interpretation: A Case Study of Zhu Xi's Commentary on the Doctrine of the Mean

WANG Lijun   

  1. School of Chinese Language and Literature, Research Center for Folklore, Classics and Chinese Characters, BNU, Beijing 100875, China
  • Online:2025-03-25 Published:2025-04-11

摘要: 由训诂通义理,是古代经典阐释的必由之路。朱熹借助择义明理、易字明理、辨句明理、析章明理、联篇明理等多种训诂手段,对他所建构的以《中庸》为理论纲领的新经典体系进行系统阐释,为从传统儒家学说蜕变而来的新儒学思想寻求文本理据支撑。从字到词,从句到篇,再到跨文本的大语境,朱熹都能精心经营、巧妙阐释,通过体系化的训诂机制,进一步深化了“训诂、义理相为表里”这一命题的内涵。

关键词: 训诂, 义理, 训诂学, 阐释学

Abstract: Attaining argumentation through exegesis constitutes the essential pathway in classical Chinese hermeneutics.Zhu Xi has systematically elucidated his neo-canonical system, with the Doctrine of the Mean as its theoretical framework, through multifaceted exegetical methods, including selecting meanings to clarify argumentation, altering characters to elucidate argumentation, analyzing sentences to reveal argumentation, dissecting chapters to illuminate argumentation, and crossing multiple texts to demonstrate argumentation.These methods have provided textual substantiation for the Neo-Confucian thought that emerged from traditional Confucian doctrines.From characters to words, from sentences to chapters, and then to cross-textual contextualization, Zhu Xi has made meticulous applications and skillful interpretations, further deepening the proposition that “exegesis and argumentation are two sides of the same coin” through the proficient application of a systematic exegetical mechanism.

Key words: exegesis, argumentation, exegetics, hermeneutics

中图分类号: