欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 13-25.

• 教育论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国教育收益率的元分析

刘泽云, 刘佳璇   

  1. 北京师范大学 经济与工商管理学院、首都教育经济研究院,北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-01 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-12-02
  • 通讯作者: 刘佳璇,E-mail:1287458912@qq.com

A Meta-analysis on the Returns to Education in China

LIU Zeyun, LIU Jiaxuan   

  1. Business School/Capital Institute for Economics of Education,BNU,Beijing 100875,China
  • Received:2020-07-01 Online:2020-09-25 Published:2020-12-02

摘要: 教育收益率,衡量了个体从教育投资中获得的经济回报。我国正处于经济和教育快速发展、转型和改革不断深入的历史时期,合理估计教育收益率、正确把握教育收益率的变化趋势和群体间差异,对于加快人力资本积累、合理制定教育政策和收入分配政策、推进劳动力市场的市场化进程、优化个人教育决策具有重要意义。基于中文期刊文献对中国教育收益率研究进行的元分析发现,对于中国教育收益率和高等教育收益率的估计结果在不同研究之间存在明显的异质性。首先,从1988年到2013年,教育收益率随年份的推移呈现递减的增长趋势;而高等教育收益率在2005年之前随时间增长,此后出现下降。其次,教育收益率和高等教育收益率存在城乡差异和性别差异,即城镇高于农村,女性高于男性。再次,使用工具变量法的研究倾向于得到更高的教育收益率估计结果。最后,基于不同的数据库估计出的教育收益率存在差异。另外,发表偏误检验的结果则表明,中国教育收益率和高等教育收益率研究均存在显著的发表偏误,即回归结果越显著的研究越有可能被发表。因此,在分析中国教育收益率的变化趋势及其群体差异时,必须考虑研究之间的异质性和可能存在的发表偏误。未来的中国教育收益率研究应该重点关注以下几个方面:改进研究设计和估计方法以更准确地识别教育对个人收入的因果性影响,探究2012年之后教育收益率的最新变化趋势,持续关注教育收益率的城乡差异和性别差异,积极开展估计教育质量收益的研究。

关键词: 教育收益率, 元分析, 发表偏误, 教育质量收益

Abstract: The returns to education is a measure of the economic returns that individuals get from their investment in education.China is in the historical period of rapid development and deepening transformation and reform in economy and education.Precise estimations of the returns to education and its changing trend as well as their differences among groups are important for the accumulation of human capital,the formulation of education policies and income distribution policies,the marketization process of labor market,and the optimization of personal education decisions.Based on an investigation on the Chinese journal literatures,this paper presents a meta-analysis on the returns to education in China,which reveals that the meta-regressions show obvious heterogeneity between the studies in estimating the returns to education and higher education:(1) the returns to education developed at a decreasing rate between 1988 to 2013,while the returns to higher education increased before 2005 and decreased after that; (2) the returns to education are higher in urban areas than in rural areas,and higher for the female than the male; (3) the returns to education are higher in studies that use instrumental variables methods; (4) the returns to education are different from estimations based on different databases.The significant publication bias is also found,which means that studies with higher statistical significance are more likely to be published.Some agendas are put forward for the future research on the returns to education: improve the researching and estimating methods to conduct more accurate estimation of the causal effect of education on income,explore the trend of the returns to education after 2012,continue to focus on urban-rural difference and gender difference in the returns to education,and conduct more researches on the returns to educational quality.

Key words: the returns to education, meta-analysis, publication bias, the returns to educational quality

中图分类号: