欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 120-126.

• 哲学反思 • 上一篇    下一篇

论普兰查斯对福柯权力思想的批判

张超   

  1. 北京师范大学 哲学学院、价值与文化研究中心,北京,100875
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-15 出版日期:2018-04-20 发布日期:2019-06-20

A Study of Poulantzas' Critique on Foucault's Power Theory

ZHANG Chao   

  1. School of Philosophy & Research Center for Value and Culture, BNU, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2017-10-15 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2019-06-20

摘要: 福柯在20世纪70年代提出了微观权力学理论,这引起了结构主义的马克思主义理论家普兰查斯的批评。福柯主张深入到社会的微观层面研究权力的多样性与不确定性,普兰查斯着重考察权力的结构性特征,认为权力表达结构整体对处于冲突中的各个阶级的实践关系的影响。普兰查斯从结构主义角度指出福柯思想的局限性,他从权力与生产关系、权力与国家、权力与阶级斗争、权力与知识的关系对福柯权力思想展开批判。这启发我们回归马克思关于权力分析的资本逻辑,结合结构与实践将宏观权力与微观权力进行有机统一。

关键词: 福柯, 微观权力, 普兰查斯, 结构主义, 批判

Abstract: Foucault advanced the theory of micro-power in the 1970s which led to the criticism from Poulantzas, a well-known Structural Marxism theorist. Foucault advocated a deep investigation into the diversity and uncertainty of the power at a micro level. Poulantzas, however, focused on the structural characteristics of power, and believed that power indicated the influence of the structure on the inter-relations between different classes in conflict. He pointed out the limitations of Foucault's thought from a macro dimension of the state power. Poulantzas further criticized Foucault's power theory from the relation between power and production, power and state, power and class struggle, and power and knowledge, which led us back to Marx's capital and power analysis and a unity between the macro power and micro power.

Key words: Foucault, micro-power, Poulantzas, structuralism, Critique

中图分类号: