欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 131-140.

• 经济社会 • 上一篇    下一篇

互依联盟何以可能?——中国枢纽型社会组织与国家之关系及其改革走向

张荆红1, 丁宇2   

  1. 1.武汉科技大学 文法与经济学院/湖北省非营利组织研究中心,武汉 430065;
    2.武汉科技大学 文法与经济学院,武汉 430065
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-11 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2019-06-21
  • 通讯作者: 丁宇,E-mail:wkddy@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国国家治理现代化的战略愿景与路径优化研究”(14AZD009),湖北省非营利组织研究中心重点项目“枢纽型社会组织运作机制研究”(HBNPOZD05)。

Interdependence Alliancs:Understanding the Relations and Their Reforms between the Hub-type Social Organizations and the State in China

ZHANG Jing-hong1, DING Yu2   

  1. 1.School of Economics, Literature and law/ Hubei Nonprofit Organization Center, Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430065;
    2.School of Economics, Literature and law, Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430065, China
  • Received:2018-09-11 Online:2018-11-25 Published:2019-06-21

摘要: 中共十九大政治报告明确提出,要根据国情改革中国的社会组织,有效改善社会组织内部的结构功能和运行效率,以及它们与国家和政府的关系,这给我们重新审视中国的社会组织及其与国家、政府的关系提供了新思维。西方多元主义理论认为,作为整体的国家与社会组织之间是此消彼长的零和博弈关系。然而,中国枢纽型社会组织与国家的互依联盟实践表明,国家和社会组织之间也可能是合作共赢关系。国家和枢纽型社会组织构筑互依联盟的内在动力在于,互依联盟有助于确保双方获得各自所需的资源。互依联盟的国家法团主义本质,具有以下优势:促进国家社会的良好合作、推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化以及提升社会组织公共服务能力等。同时,互依联盟也存在以下不足:枢纽型社会组织的“政治化”和“行政化”倾向、抑制其他社会组织的成长以及发展方向的不确定等。因此,枢纽型社会组织应采取去行政化、社会化、具有相对独立性的相互依存等改革措施,推进国家法团主义向社会法团主义转型。

关键词: 互依联盟, 枢纽型社会组织, 国家法团主义, 国家与社会

Abstract: According to the theory of state-society relationship, state and social organizations are in the zero-sum game as a whole. However, empirical evidence of interdependence alliances between the hub-type social organizations and the state in China show that the state and the social organizations may also be a win-win relationship. The dynamic of the alliance is that both can get the resources they need for survive from the alliance. In terms of the state, the alliance will help to strengthen the CPC's legitimacy, maintain social stability and improve social governance. As to the hub-type social organizations, the alliance may help them to obtain the monopoly status of “government agents” and multiple resources. The interdependence alliance is the embodiment of state corporatism in China, and which may enhance the cooperation of the state and the society, promote the systematization and public service capabilities of social organizations. The alliance also brings some drawbacks such as bureaucratic tendency, suppressing the space of other social organizations and uncertain development direction. Therefore we have to take three corresponding measures to reform them: de-administration, socialization and transformation from state corporatism to social corporatism.

Key words: Interdependent alliances, hub-type social organization, state corporatism, state-society relationship

中图分类号: