欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 103-121.

• 哲学反思 • 上一篇    下一篇

马克思的社会历史线性演化逻辑及其语境

宫敬才, 谷菁菁   

  1. 河北大学 政法学院哲学系,保定 071002
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-25 出版日期:2020-01-25 发布日期:2020-12-09

The Linear Evolutionary Logic of Social History and Its Context in Karl Marx's Political Economy Proposition

GONG Jingcai, GU Jingjing   

  1. Philosophy Department,School of Politics and Law,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China
  • Received:2019-05-25 Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-12-09

摘要: 马克思在《资本论》中提出了政治经济学命题:“工业较发达的国家向工业较不发达的国家所显示的,只是后者未来的景象。”这一命题内含经济哲学内容,概括性表述是社会历史线性演化逻辑。在马克思文献中,该逻辑存在于四种语境即原生态语境、一般性理论语境、东方特定社会历史情势语境和俄国特定社会历史情势语境之中。不同语境中表现出来的逻辑样态各异,后人理解成百家争鸣之势,但其中有的内容被忽略,如东方特定社会历史情势语境中的外力论;有的内容被主观性解读,如俄国特定社会历史情势语境中农业公社命运的例外论。这种理论情势给马克思主义研究者提出了问题:一般性理论语境中的社会历史线性演化逻辑是否具有普遍适用性?东方特定社会历史情势语境中的外力论与一般性理论语境中的社会历史线性演化逻辑是什么关系?俄国特定社会历史情势语境中的例外论是马克思基本立场吗?如果是,该立场与一般性理论语境中的社会历史线性演化逻辑相冲突如何解释?为了维护一般性理论语境中社会历史线性演化逻辑的纯正性,语境问题成为必须在自觉意识层面被关注和研究的对象。研究不同语境中马克思原生态社会历史线性演化逻辑思想,是应当被提上议事日程的任务。

关键词: 社会历史线性演化逻辑, 东方特定社会历史情势语境, 俄国特定社会历史情势语境

Abstract: In his works On Capital,Karl Marx put forward the proposition of political economy,“what the more developed countries show to the less developed ones is only the future of the latter.” This proposition contains economic philosophy content,and the generalized expression can been seen as the linear evolutionary logic of social history.In Marx's text,this logic exists in four contexts:the original context,the general theoretical context,the context of the specific social historical situation in the East,and the context of the specific social historical situation in Russia.The logical patterns vary in different contexts,which is interpreted by the later scholars as the trend of diversification,but all contexts are not attached equal importance to,for instance,the external force theory in the context of the specific social historical situation in the East is ignored,and some contents like the exceptionalism of agricultural communes in the context of specific social and historical situations in Russia are interpreted subjectively.This theoretical situation raises questions for Marxist researchers:Is the linear evolution logic of social history universally applicable in the context of general theory?What is the relationship between the theory of external forces in the context of specific social and historical situations in the East and the linear evolution logic of social history in the general theoretical context?Is the exceptionalism in the context of a particular social and historical situation in Russia the basic position of Marx?If so,how does this position conflict with the linear evolutionary logic of social history in the context of general theory?In order to maintain the purity of the linear evolution logic of social history in the general theoretical context,the context problem has become the objective that deserves attention and studying at the ideological level,so it is of great value to study the linear evolution of Marx's original social history in different contexts.

Key words: the linear evolutionary logic of social history, context of specific social and historical situations in the East, context of a particular social and historical situation in Russia

中图分类号: