欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 92-102.

• 史学前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

“明是非”与“别真伪”——对清末民初文史研究取向的检讨

姜萌   

  1. 中国人民大学 历史学院,北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-09 出版日期:2020-01-25 发布日期:2020-12-09

What is the Significance of Chinese Modern Humanities? A review of academic ideas in late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China

JIANG Meng   

  1. School of History,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China
  • Received:2019-08-09 Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-12-09

摘要: 中国学术思想界在甲午惨败后出现了对中国传统学术文化进行深刻批判的动向。他们肯定西学、批判中学的本意,是要为衰弱的中国寻找救亡图存药方。意想不到的是,对传统学术的新认识却开启了中国人文学术的去价值化运动:“六经”从辨明“是非”之基础,转变为只是考辨“真伪”所需之材料。胡适、顾颉刚等人继承发展了这种意识,突显“别真伪”的价值,引领了民国文史学术研究的发展。与此同时,社会转型导致的道德价值危机对社会生活的影响日渐显现。一些学者在“学以载道”传统的基础上,期望中国现代学术能汲取中西学术文化的精华,熔铸适宜现代中国的“国民道德”。重“求真”的学术研究取向,和构建现代道德伦理的社会期望之冲突,构成了清末民国时期文史之学发展的重大理论困境。文史之学是该 “别真伪”,还是“明是非”?这是中国现代人文学术从业者一直探索的重要问题。

关键词: 现代人文学术, 道德价值体系, 去价值化, 学术认识论, 国民道德

Abstract: After China's fiasco in the First Sino-Japan War(1894 A.D.-1895 A.D.),there arose a trend in Chinese scholars of harshly criticizing the Chinese traditional academic culture.By approving western knowledge and criticizing Chinese learning,they intended to find an urgent cure to save the nation from fragile condition.Unexpectedly,the new understanding of traditional Chinese learning caused the devaluation of Chinese humanities.The six Confucian classics were used as the material to prove historical truth and falsehood,rather than the basis of distinguishing between right and wrong as they used to be.HU Shi and GU Jiegang inherited and developed this kind of thoughts by emphasizing the role of “distinguishing between truth and falsehood” and leading the mainstream of the humanistic research in the Republic of China.At the same time,the crisis in ethical and moral value system caused by social transformation became more and more influential to social life.Some scholars expected to draw the essence from Chinese and Western learnings to create a “national morality” suitable for modern China.The conflict between the academic research orientation of “seeking truth” and the social expectation of rebuilding morality and ethics constitutes a great theoretical dilemma for the development of Chinese literature and history studies in the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China.Which could be considered as the top significance of Chinese literature and history studies,“distinguishing between truth and falsehood” or “distinguishing between right and wrong”?This question has never been very well answered and is left for the Chinese scholars of modern humanities to keep exploring.

Key words: modern humanities, moral value system, devaluing, academic epistemology, national morality

中图分类号: