欢迎访问《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版),今天是

北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 5-13.

• 马克思主义发展史研究 •    下一篇

马克思对古典经济学的超越及其哲学意义

唐正东   

  1. 南京大学 马克思主义社会理论研究中心、哲学系,南京 210023
  • 出版日期:2022-07-25 发布日期:2022-08-19
  • 作者简介:唐正东,哲学博士,南京大学马克思主义社会理论研究中心、哲学系教授。
  • 基金资助:
    中宣部文化名家暨“四个一批”人才工程项目“历史唯物主义研究在西方学界的三大转向及其评价”(中宣办发〔2015〕49号)。

Marx's Transcendence of Classical Economics and Its Philosophical Significance

TANG Zhengdong   

  1. Center for Studies of Marxist Social Theory,Department of Philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China
  • Online:2022-07-25 Published:2022-08-19

摘要: 亚当·斯密的劳动价值论以手工业资本主义为背景,凸显了市场主体之间的相互关系,李嘉图的劳动价值论以资本主义机器大工业为背景,强调了交换关系的社会化过程的经济学意义,但他只是从价格竞争这一经济学维度来理解这种社会化过程的内涵;马克思对斯密、李嘉图古典经济学的超越经历了从人本主义向历史唯物主义发展的历程,他以社会经济形态内在矛盾性的视角打破了古典经济学的单纯经济学思路,同时也超越了人本主义者的物化批判思路,从而把资本主义批判理论提升到一个崭新的学术层面。因此,马克思的历史唯物主义与社会唯物主义在哲学方法论上有着本质区别,它是从历史性社会形态的角度来理解经济事实的。

关键词: 马克思, 古典经济学, 超越, 哲学

Abstract: Adam Smith's labor-value theory takes handicraft capitalism as the background,highlighting the relationship between market subjects.David Ricardo's labor-value theory takes capitalist machine industry as the background and emphasizes the economic significance of the socialization process of exchange relationship,but he only understands the connotation of this socialization process from the economic dimension of price competition.Marx's transcendence of Smith and Ricardo's classical economics has experienced the development process from humanism to historical materialism.From the perspective of the internal contradiction of socio-economic form,he not only broke the simple economic thinking of classical economics,but also surpassed the humanist criticism of fetishism,promoting the capitalist critical theory to a new academic level.Thus,there is an essential difference in philosophical methodology between Marx's historical materialism and social materialism,and the former understands economic facts from the perspective of historical social form.

Key words: Marx, classical economics, transcendence, philosophy

中图分类号: